The Low-Price Illusion: Antitrust Case Exposes Amazon

Since the 1990s, one claim has underwritten the rise of Amazon: That they offer lower prices, better deals, and relentless efficiency on behalf of the customer.

That corporate narrative trained millions of buyers to assume that whatever price appeared on Amazon’s listings reflected the natural outcome of competition. The algorithm, we were told, would find the lowest number. The market would handle the rest.

Newly unsealed evidence in a California antitrust case tells a shockingly different story.

According to filings by California’s attorney general, Amazon allegedly coordinated with brands and pressured rival retailers to raise their prices rather than undercut its listings. That pressure appears to have extended across multiple industries from clothing to pet supplies, with internal communications showing Amazon urging companies to bring competitors back in line.

One example stands out for its simplicity: A pair of khaki pants listed for less on Walmart triggered a complaint. Within a day, the lower price vanished.

That is not the invisible hand of the market. It is a quite visible hand reaching across the aisle and into your pocket.

The implications reach further than one lawsuit. They strike at the central illusion of the digital retail age: that scale guarantees fairness.

Read the full post on Substack!

Acess it free for the first two weeks, then find it in the paid archive.