The Age of Timid Art: Why Modern Stories Refuse to Commit

Author Lionel Shriver recently voiced an observation many working writers already sense but hesitate to articulate. While some say that contemporary art has lost technical competence, in truth, artists have lost their nerve. It shouldn’t be surprising when so much creative output is built around anticipation of a response insteaad of commitment to vision.

This timidity rarely announces itself as fear. Instead, it presents as professionalism. Or calls itself sensitivity. Yet the practical effect remains the same. The range of permissible ideas narrows, ambition contracts, and stories become cautious before they can grow strange or sublime.

The pressure has arisen from years of accumulated perverse incentives. Writers learn quickly which statements receive establishment validation and which ruffle feathers. Over time, those lessons condition behavior. As in all areas of Current Year life, safety becomes paramount, leaving no room for risk.

Shriver’s critics tend to dismiss her argument as reactionary or nostalgic. That dismissal avoids the substance of her claim. Far from longing for a vanished era, she is calling out creators’ retreat from artistic confidence.

Note that confident work does not mean flawless work. Instead, it means a work willing to commit. Characters are allowed to behave badly without immediate correction. Ideas unfold without constant hedging. And artists accept the possibility of misunderstanding as the cost of making a concrete statement.

Read the full post on Substack!

Access it free for the first two weeks, then find it in the paid archive.