A.I. Book Scandal Proves Readers Still Care Who Writes the Story

A recent controversy has blown the lid off an open secret the publishing establishment has spent years desperately trying to ignore: Readers can tell an authored book from a generated one.

In this case, a 78 percent A.I.-generated title billed as authored work slipped past oldpub editors and onto major UK retail platforms. But readers noticed, and as you’d expect, their immediate reaction was swift and hostile.

It turns out that the big publishers don’t know better than their readers after all. Predictably, oldpub scrambled to run damage control, along with calling for more regulation. But imposing additional platform restrictions won’t solve the underlying problem: in a word, hunger.

Because readers are starving for authenticity.

For years, the common wisdom in oldpub and newpub alike held that volume was the key to success. Massaging the robot to move rapid-release titles was the winning strategy.

Now the algortihms have evolved from selling books to producing them. And the publishers who used to swear by the robot find themselves cursing it.

That reversal should not surprise anyone who’s been paying attention. The same pattern has already played out across film, television, and music. The collapses of those industries showed us that removing all effort from production drops quality to zero.

Contrary to common misperception, the latest A.I. book scandal did not create this problem. What it did was expose it. Because readers’ response exceeded rejection, approaching closer to revulsion. They demonstrated an intuitive understanding that most establishment gatekeepers lack:

Read the full post on Substack!

Access it free for the first two weeks, then find it in the paid archive.